Published finding · Bugcrowd

EPAM Systems Managed Bug Bounty Program A finding accepted against *.lab.epam.com. Bugcrowd published no award figure for it.

high unresolved

01 · The record

Everything Bugcrowd published about this

Programme: EPAM Systems Managed Bug Bounty Program In our directory, so it has reviews and a grade.
Platform handle: epam-mbb-og
Asset: *.lab.epam.com The specific asset the finding landed against, as the platform named it.
Severity: high Bugcrowd rates P1–P5; this is that rating in HackerOne's words so the two feeds can sit in one table.
Award: Not published This does not mean nothing was paid. Both platforms let a programme accept a finding without publishing the figure, and most do.
Found by: Withheld The platform did not publish a name. We store that as withheld and never guess.
State: unresolved — accepted, not yet fixed
Accepted: 24 September 2026 yesterday. This is the date the programme accepted the finding.
First seen here: 24 September 2026 When our sweep first read this entry. It says nothing about the finding, only about us.
Platform reference: 47623b67-f2ea-40b8-bda6-21976147fcbc

View the programme on Bugcrowd ↗ Bugcrowd publishes the acceptance, not the submission. There is no public write-up for this finding anywhere, and no page for the entry itself, so this link goes to the programme. Everything Bugcrowd did publish about it is already above.

03 · The programme

What else EPAM Systems Managed Bug Bounty Program has published

*.epam.com high · unresolved · withheld · yesterday $600
*.projects.epam.com high · unresolved · withheld · 2 days ago —
*.epam.com low · unresolved · MannuMourya · 3 days ago —
*.projects.epam.com high · unresolved · withheld · 7 days ago —
*.epam.com low · unresolved · sadchili · 8 days ago $100
Subdomain takeover medium · resolved · withheld · 9 days ago —
*.epam.com medium · unresolved · MannuMourya · 9 days ago —
*.epam.com critical · unresolved · withheld · 17 days ago —

See EPAM Systems Managed Bug Bounty Program's grade and researcher reviews →

Where this came from. One row of a public platform feed, stored as published and never edited. We hold no report title, no write-up and no reproduction steps, because the feeds do not carry them and we do not go looking for them. A withheld name stays withheld; if a finder later asks the platform to un-name them, the next sweep un-names them here. Absence of an award figure is publication policy, not evidence a programme did not pay.