BugRater
Early access: the directory is still filling out, and every rating here is a reported experience.
← The brief
Published finding · Bugcrowd

Mastercard Public Bug Bounty A finding accepted against Public Others Target. Bugcrowd published no award figure for it.

critical unresolved
01 · The record

Everything Bugcrowd published about this

Programme
Mastercard Public Bug Bounty In our directory, so it has reviews and a grade.
Platform handle
mastercard
Asset
Public Others Target The specific asset the finding landed against, as the platform named it.
Severity
critical Bugcrowd rates P1–P5; this is that rating in HackerOne's words so the two feeds can sit in one table.
Award
Not published This does not mean nothing was paid. Both platforms let a programme accept a finding without publishing the figure, and most do.
Found by
DarkSql Named because the finder allowed the platform to name them.
State
unresolved — accepted, not yet fixed
Accepted
25 September 2026 yesterday. This is the date the programme accepted the finding.
First seen here
25 September 2026 When our sweep first read this entry. It says nothing about the finding, only about us.
Platform reference
538a6f04-01e5-47ec-bd85-17a24f66b645
View the programme on Bugcrowd ↗ Bugcrowd publishes the acceptance, not the submission. There is no public write-up for this finding anywhere, and no page for the entry itself, so this link goes to the programme. Everything Bugcrowd did publish about it is already above.
03 · The finder

The only finding we hold from DarkSql

This is the only published finding we hold from DarkSql on Bugcrowd. That is a statement about our coverage, not about their record: we read a few pages of each feed per sweep, and most accepted work is never published at all.

Counted within Bugcrowd only. The same handle on another platform may or may not be the same person, and this page will not assume it is.

04 · The programme

What else Mastercard Public Bug Bounty has published

See Mastercard Public Bug Bounty's grade and researcher reviews →

Where this came from. One row of a public platform feed, stored as published and never edited. We hold no report title, no write-up and no reproduction steps, because the feeds do not carry them and we do not go looking for them. A withheld name stays withheld; if a finder later asks the platform to un-name them, the next sweep un-names them here. Absence of an award figure is publication policy, not evidence a programme did not pay.