← The brief
01 · The record
03 · The finder
04 · The programme
Published finding · Bugcrowd
Village Roadshow Vulnerability Disclosure Program A finding accepted against *.vrl.com.au. Bugcrowd published no award figure for it.
Everything Bugcrowd published about this
- Programme
- Village Roadshow Vulnerability Disclosure Program Not in our directory yet, so there is no grade or review page for it. The event is kept regardless.
- Platform handle
- village-roadshow-vdp-pro
- Asset
- *.vrl.com.au The specific asset the finding landed against, as the platform named it.
- Severity
- low Bugcrowd rates P1–P5; this is that rating in HackerOne's words so the two feeds can sit in one table.
- Award
- Not published This does not mean nothing was paid. Both platforms let a programme accept a finding without publishing the figure, and most do.
- Found by
- AndreaAmaddio Named because the finder allowed the platform to name them.
- State
- resolved — the programme has fixed it
- Accepted
- 17 February 2025 2 years ago. This is the date the programme accepted the finding.
- First seen here
- 12 August 2026 When our sweep first read this entry. It says nothing about the finding, only about us.
- Platform reference
- 4a4ee618-4653-48f8-9645-a8fee59d9b87
What else AndreaAmaddio has published on Bugcrowd
4published findings
3programmes
1critical
not setpublished awards
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) - Vulnerability Disclosure Program critical · https://nasa.gov · 2 years ago —
- Bureau of Reclamation medium · *.usbr.gov · 2 years ago —
- Village Roadshow Vulnerability Disclosure Program low · *.vrl.com.au · 2 years ago —
Counted within Bugcrowd only. The same handle on another platform may or may not be the same person, and this page will not assume it is.
What else Village Roadshow Vulnerability Disclosure Program has published
- *.vrl.com.au low · resolved · AndreaAmaddio · 2 years ago —
Where this came from. One row of a public platform feed, stored as published and never edited. We hold no report title, no write-up and no reproduction steps, because the feeds do not carry them and we do not go looking for them. A withheld name stays withheld; if a finder later asks the platform to un-name them, the next sweep un-names them here. Absence of an award figure is publication policy, not evidence a programme did not pay.