Published finding · Bugcrowd

Bureau of Reclamation A finding accepted against *.usbr.gov. Bugcrowd published no award figure for it.

low disclosed resolved

01 · The record

Everything Bugcrowd published about this

Programme: Bureau of Reclamation Not in our directory yet, so there is no grade or review page for it. The event is kept regardless.
Platform handle: usbr-vdp
Asset: *.usbr.gov The specific asset the finding landed against, as the platform named it.
Severity: low Bugcrowd rates P1–P5; this is that rating in HackerOne's words so the two feeds can sit in one table.
Award: Not published This does not mean nothing was paid. Both platforms let a programme accept a finding without publishing the figure, and most do.
Found by: tonyverapo Named because the finder allowed the platform to name them.
State: resolved — the programme has fixed it
Accepted: 28 March 2025 1 year ago. This is the date the programme accepted the finding.
First seen here: 12 August 2026 When our sweep first read this entry. It says nothing about the finding, only about us.
Platform reference: 25d62d7e-8489-4d63-801e-cf94f9536b10

View the programme on Bugcrowd ↗ Bugcrowd publishes the acceptance, not the submission. There is no public write-up for this finding anywhere, and no page for the entry itself, so this link goes to the programme. Everything Bugcrowd did publish about it is already above.

03 · The finder

The only finding we hold from tonyverapo

This is the only published finding we hold from tonyverapo on Bugcrowd. That is a statement about our coverage, not about their record: we read a few pages of each feed per sweep, and most accepted work is never published at all.

Counted within Bugcrowd only. The same handle on another platform may or may not be the same person, and this page will not assume it is.

04 · The programme

What else Bureau of Reclamation has published

*.usbr.gov critical · unresolved · Sleibe · 22 days ago —
*.usbr.gov critical · unresolved · Ankurgautam · 24 days ago —
*.usbr.gov medium · resolved · AndreaAmaddio · 2 years ago —

Where this came from. One row of a public platform feed, stored as published and never edited. We hold no report title, no write-up and no reproduction steps, because the feeds do not carry them and we do not go looking for them. A withheld name stays withheld; if a finder later asks the platform to un-name them, the next sweep un-names them here. Absence of an award figure is publication policy, not evidence a programme did not pay.