Published finding, Bugcrowd

T-Mobile A finding accepted against *.t-mobile.com. Bugcrowd published no award figure for it.

high resolved

The record

Everything Bugcrowd published about this

Program: T-Mobile In our directory, so it has reviews and a grade.
Platform handle: t-mobile
Asset: *.t-mobile.com The specific asset the finding landed against, as the platform named it.
Severity: high Bugcrowd rates P1–P5; this is that rating in HackerOne's words so the two feeds can sit in one table.
Award: Not published This does not mean nothing was paid. Both platforms let a program accept a finding without publishing the figure, and most do.
Found by: Withheld The platform did not publish a name. We store that as withheld and never guess.
State: resolved: the program has fixed it
Accepted: 29 October 2026 9 days ago. This is the date the program accepted the finding.
First seen here: 29 October 2026 When our sweep first read this entry. It says nothing about the finding, only about us.
Platform reference: bc278f14-3fef-45c4-842a-710b14e99c1c

View the program on Bugcrowd ↗ Bugcrowd publishes the acceptance, not the submission. There is no public write-up for this finding anywhere, and no page for the entry itself, so this link goes to the program. Everything Bugcrowd did publish about it is already above.

03, The program

What else T-Mobile has published

*.t-mobile.com high , unresolved , poisonivy, 4 days ago –
tess.service-now.com high , unresolved , withheld, 8 days ago –
*.t-mobile.com critical , unresolved , Crelic, 10 days ago –
Finding accepted high , unresolved , withheld, 12 days ago –
blis.com critical , resolved , dwbzn, 14 days ago –
*.t-mobile.com critical , unresolved , withheld, 15 days ago –
*.t-mobile.com medium , unresolved , Nishant57, 16 days ago –
*.t-mobile.com critical , unresolved , dwbzn, 16 days ago –

See T-Mobile's grade and researcher reviews

Where this came from. One row of a public platform feed, stored as published and never edited. We hold no report title, no write-up and no reproduction steps, because the feeds do not carry them and we do not go looking for them. A withheld name stays withheld; if a finder later asks the platform to un-name them, the next sweep un-names them here. Absence of an award figure is publication policy, not evidence a program did not pay.