BugRater
Early access: the directory is still filling out, and every rating here is a reported experience.
← The brief
Published finding · Bugcrowd

$2,150 awarded on Viator, against https://supplier.viator.com/.

high paid resolved
01 · The record

Everything Bugcrowd published about this

Programme
Viator In our directory, so it has reviews and a grade.
Platform handle
viator
Asset
https://supplier.viator.com/ The specific asset the finding landed against, as the platform named it.
Severity
high Bugcrowd rates P1–P5; this is that rating in HackerOne's words so the two feeds can sit in one table.
Award
$2,150 What the platform printed. Where a report carried more than one payment they are summed.
Found by
ACH21 Named because the finder allowed the platform to name them.
State
resolved — the programme has fixed it
Accepted
10 August 2026 2 months ago. This is the date the programme accepted the finding.
First seen here
12 August 2026 When our sweep first read this entry. It says nothing about the finding, only about us.
Platform reference
28be574e-15c7-44e2-833b-b023325bfa8e
View the programme on Bugcrowd ↗ Bugcrowd publishes the acceptance, not the submission. There is no public write-up for this finding anywhere, and no page for the entry itself, so this link goes to the programme. Everything Bugcrowd did publish about it is already above.
02 · Is this figure normal

Where this award sits

A single large number tells you nothing on its own. What matters is whether this programme pays like this routinely or whether this was the one time it did.

#1 of 6 here
$488 this programme's median
$2,150 its largest published
#248 of 1,427 awards we hold

This is the largest award we have ever seen this programme publish, out of 6 awards. At 4.4× the median, it is well above what this programme normally prints.

Every figure here is drawn only from awards a platform chose to publish, which is a minority of what gets paid. Read the median as "of the payouts made public", never as "what this programme pays".

03 · The finder

The only finding we hold from ACH21

This is the only published finding we hold from ACH21 on Bugcrowd. That is a statement about our coverage, not about their record: we read a few pages of each feed per sweep, and most accepted work is never published at all.

Counted within Bugcrowd only. The same handle on another platform may or may not be the same person, and this page will not assume it is.

04 · The programme

What else Viator has published

See Viator's grade and researcher reviews →

Where this came from. One row of a public platform feed, stored as published and never edited. We hold no report title, no write-up and no reproduction steps, because the feeds do not carry them and we do not go looking for them. A withheld name stays withheld; if a finder later asks the platform to un-name them, the next sweep un-names them here. Absence of an award figure is publication policy, not evidence a programme did not pay.