Published finding · Bugcrowd

JLL Vulnerability Disclosure Engagement A finding accepted against *.jll.com. Bugcrowd published no award figure for it.

critical resolved

01 · The record

Everything Bugcrowd published about this

Programme: JLL Vulnerability Disclosure Engagement Not in our directory yet, so there is no grade or review page for it. The event is kept regardless.
Platform handle: jll-vdp-pro
Asset: *.jll.com The specific asset the finding landed against, as the platform named it.
Severity: critical Bugcrowd rates P1–P5; this is that rating in HackerOne's words so the two feeds can sit in one table.
Award: Not published This does not mean nothing was paid. Both platforms let a programme accept a finding without publishing the figure, and most do.
Found by: Yash008 Named because the finder allowed the platform to name them.
State: resolved — the programme has fixed it
Accepted: 20 August 2026 1 month ago. This is the date the programme accepted the finding.
First seen here: 20 August 2026 When our sweep first read this entry. It says nothing about the finding, only about us.
Platform reference: 4f7affe2-336d-4e4a-a9e4-765b89756c45

View the programme on Bugcrowd ↗ Bugcrowd publishes the acceptance, not the submission. There is no public write-up for this finding anywhere, and no page for the entry itself, so this link goes to the programme. Everything Bugcrowd did publish about it is already above.

03 · The finder

What else Yash008 has published on Bugcrowd

2published findings

2programmes

1critical

not setpublished awards

BOSCH Public Vulnerability Disclosure Engagement high · Websites from Bosch and its brands · 29 days ago —

Counted within Bugcrowd only. The same handle on another platform may or may not be the same person, and this page will not assume it is.

04 · The programme

What else JLL Vulnerability Disclosure Engagement has published

*.corrigopro-qa.com critical · unresolved · Wolfareen · 1 month ago —
*.jllt.com medium · unresolved · withheld · 1 month ago —
*.jll.com medium · unresolved · YTrineshReddy · 2 months ago —

Where this came from. One row of a public platform feed, stored as published and never edited. We hold no report title, no write-up and no reproduction steps, because the feeds do not carry them and we do not go looking for them. A withheld name stays withheld; if a finder later asks the platform to un-name them, the next sweep un-names them here. Absence of an award figure is publication policy, not evidence a programme did not pay.