BugRater
Early access. The directory is still filling out, and every rating here comes from a researcher's reported experience.
← The brief
Published finding, Bugcrowd

Fivetran A finding accepted against *.fivetran.com. Bugcrowd published no award figure for it.

none resolved
The record

Everything Bugcrowd published about this

Program
Fivetran In our directory, so it has reviews and a grade.
Platform handle
fivetran-mbb-og
Asset
*.fivetran.com The specific asset the finding landed against, as the platform named it.
Severity
none Bugcrowd rates P1–P5; this is that rating in HackerOne's words so the two feeds can sit in one table.
Award
Not published This does not mean nothing was paid. Both platforms let a program accept a finding without publishing the figure, and most do.
Found by
EmperorEye Named because the finder allowed the platform to name them.
State
resolved: the program has fixed it
Accepted
25 August 2026 2 months ago. This is the date the program accepted the finding.
First seen here
25 August 2026 When our sweep first read this entry. It says nothing about the finding, only about us.
Platform reference
503e1ee4-515e-4621-8b26-537bfe1d072d
View the program on Bugcrowd ↗ Bugcrowd publishes the acceptance, not the submission. There is no public write-up for this finding anywhere, and no page for the entry itself, so this link goes to the program. Everything Bugcrowd did publish about it is already above.
The finder

What else EmperorEye has published on Bugcrowd

33published findings
20programs
5critical
not setpublished awards

Counted within Bugcrowd only. The same handle on another platform may or may not be the same person, and this page will not assume it is.

04, The program

What else Fivetran has published

See Fivetran's grade and researcher reviews

Where this came from. One row of a public platform feed, stored as published and never edited. We hold no report title, no write-up and no reproduction steps, because the feeds do not carry them and we do not go looking for them. A withheld name stays withheld; if a finder later asks the platform to un-name them, the next sweep un-names them here. Absence of an award figure is publication policy, not evidence a program did not pay.