Nine Entertainment Vulnerability Disclosure Program A finding accepted against nine.com.au. Bugcrowd published no award figure for it.
Everything Bugcrowd published about this
- Programme
- Nine Entertainment Vulnerability Disclosure Program Not in our directory yet, so there is no grade or review page for it. The event is kept regardless.
- Platform handle
- nine-entertainment-vdp-pro
- Asset
- nine.com.au The specific asset the finding landed against, as the platform named it.
- Severity
- high Bugcrowd rates P1–P5; this is that rating in HackerOne's words so the two feeds can sit in one table.
- Award
- Not published This does not mean nothing was paid. Both platforms let a programme accept a finding without publishing the figure, and most do.
- Found by
- fm_q80 Named because the finder allowed the platform to name them.
- State
- resolved — the programme has fixed it
- Accepted
- 27 August 2026 29 days ago. This is the date the programme accepted the finding.
- First seen here
- 27 August 2026 When our sweep first read this entry. It says nothing about the finding, only about us.
- Platform reference
- f25d859e-1b7f-4144-9f6a-3b217069fe51
The only finding we hold from fm_q80
This is the only published finding we hold from fm_q80 on Bugcrowd. That is a statement about our coverage, not about their record: we read a few pages of each feed per sweep, and most accepted work is never published at all.
Counted within Bugcrowd only. The same handle on another platform may or may not be the same person, and this page will not assume it is.
What else Nine Entertainment Vulnerability Disclosure Program has published
- Any Nine owned asset low · unresolved · astronomikal · 9 days ago —
- Stan - Android medium · resolved · astronomikal · 29 days ago —
- 9now.com.au medium · unresolved · Ankurgautam · 1 month ago —
- smh.com.au low · unresolved · withheld · 2 months ago —
- nine.com.au low · resolved · withheld · 2 months ago —
Where this came from. One row of a public platform feed, stored as published and never edited. We hold no report title, no write-up and no reproduction steps, because the feeds do not carry them and we do not go looking for them. A withheld name stays withheld; if a finder later asks the platform to un-name them, the next sweep un-names them here. Absence of an award figure is publication policy, not evidence a programme did not pay.