Early access: the directory is still filling out, and every rating here is a reported experience.
← The brief
Published finding · Bugcrowd

U.S. Department of Commerce - Vulnerability Disclosure Program A finding accepted against *.noaa.gov. Bugcrowd published no award figure for it.

critical unresolved
01 · The record

Everything Bugcrowd published about this

Programme
U.S. Department of Commerce - Vulnerability Disclosure Program Not in our directory yet, so there is no grade or review page for it. The event is kept regardless.
Platform handle
usdoc-vdp
Asset
*.noaa.gov The specific asset the finding landed against, as the platform named it.
Severity
critical Bugcrowd rates P1–P5; this is that rating in HackerOne's words so the two feeds can sit in one table.
Award
Not published This does not mean nothing was paid. Both platforms let a programme accept a finding without publishing the figure, and most do.
Found by
Sleibe Named because the finder allowed the platform to name them.
State
unresolved — accepted, not yet fixed
Accepted
1 September 2026 24 days ago. This is the date the programme accepted the finding.
First seen here
1 September 2026 When our sweep first read this entry. It says nothing about the finding, only about us.
Platform reference
6e5c5eaf-b83a-42e7-8fb1-ccd2f64d0bf0
View the programme on Bugcrowd ↗ Bugcrowd publishes the acceptance, not the submission. There is no public write-up for this finding anywhere, and no page for the entry itself, so this link goes to the programme. Everything Bugcrowd did publish about it is already above.
03 · The finder

What else Sleibe has published on Bugcrowd

10published findings
8programmes
9critical
$2,500published awards

Counted within Bugcrowd only. The same handle on another platform may or may not be the same person, and this page will not assume it is.

04 · The programme

What else U.S. Department of Commerce - Vulnerability Disclosure Program has published

Where this came from. One row of a public platform feed, stored as published and never edited. We hold no report title, no write-up and no reproduction steps, because the feeds do not carry them and we do not go looking for them. A withheld name stays withheld; if a finder later asks the platform to un-name them, the next sweep un-names them here. Absence of an award figure is publication policy, not evidence a programme did not pay.