BugRater
Early access: the directory is still filling out, and every rating here is a reported experience.
← The brief
Published finding · Bugcrowd

Petpooja Vulnerability Disclosure Program A finding accepted against Petpooja Production Web Applications & APIs. Bugcrowd published no award figure for it.

high unresolved
01 · The record

Everything Bugcrowd published about this

Programme
Petpooja Vulnerability Disclosure Program Not in our directory yet, so there is no grade or review page for it. The event is kept regardless.
Platform handle
petpooja-vdp-pro
Asset
Petpooja Production Web Applications & APIs The specific asset the finding landed against, as the platform named it.
Severity
high Bugcrowd rates P1–P5; this is that rating in HackerOne's words so the two feeds can sit in one table.
Award
Not published This does not mean nothing was paid. Both platforms let a programme accept a finding without publishing the figure, and most do.
Found by
jacob0224 Named because the finder allowed the platform to name them.
State
unresolved — accepted, not yet fixed
Accepted
14 September 2026 12 days ago. This is the date the programme accepted the finding.
First seen here
14 September 2026 When our sweep first read this entry. It says nothing about the finding, only about us.
Platform reference
facdc755-f440-4a99-9ff4-9e25f821ca74
View the programme on Bugcrowd ↗ Bugcrowd publishes the acceptance, not the submission. There is no public write-up for this finding anywhere, and no page for the entry itself, so this link goes to the programme. Everything Bugcrowd did publish about it is already above.
03 · The finder

What else jacob0224 has published on Bugcrowd

16published findings
7programmes
4critical
$1,200published awards

Counted within Bugcrowd only. The same handle on another platform may or may not be the same person, and this page will not assume it is.

04 · The programme

What else Petpooja Vulnerability Disclosure Program has published

Where this came from. One row of a public platform feed, stored as published and never edited. We hold no report title, no write-up and no reproduction steps, because the feeds do not carry them and we do not go looking for them. A withheld name stays withheld; if a finder later asks the platform to un-name them, the next sweep un-names them here. Absence of an award figure is publication policy, not evidence a programme did not pay.