Early access: the directory is still filling out, and every rating here is a reported experience.
NR Unrated
Moneybird
Moneybird HackerOne
3 more reviews needed for a grade
Write a review Claim this company profile

Work at Moneybird? Claim it to respond to reviews as the verified owner.

Found a vulnerability?

If you would rather not deal with the vendor yourself, a BugRater analyst will submit it upstream on your behalf, with your explicit permission, and tell you what came back.

Ask BugRater to submit it

Private. The report body is encrypted at rest; BugRater holds the key, so the analyst working it can read it. Every read is logged.

Program metrics HackerOne · published

HackerOne’s own figures for this program, read from its public page, not reported by researchers and not part of the BugRater grade. Captured 22 Sep 2026.

What it pays, by severity

Critical $150 avg 8 reports indicative
High $67 avg 16 reports indicative
Medium $83 avg 52 reports firm
Low amount not published 36 reports

$10,000 paid to researchers in total, $5,000 of it in the last 90 days. Lifetime figure as HackerOne prints it: evidence this program has paid, not a promise about any one report.

Intake & responsiveness · last 90 days

Reports received
42
in 90 days
Resolved
204
all time, last one yesterday
Participants
291
hunters engaged
Response efficiency
88%
meeting its targets, HackerOne’s figure
SLA misses
0
targets missed
Reports received · day by day, last 15 days 37–42
25 Aug 42 reports 22 Sep

Response targets it sets itself

First response
1 day
Triage
2 days
Bounty
30 days
Resolution
30 days

A target the program declared, not a measurement of it being met.

Getting in the door

bounty amounts hidden

Over 33 days (18 snapshots): intake up 2 reports; response efficiency down 2 points.

See how this programme’s report load compares to others →

Reviews

0 published

No reviews yet.

Be the first to review

Who this program credits

303 credited

Researchers HackerOne shows on this program’s public thanks list, best position first. “Recognised” is how many of a hunter’s submissions the program accepted; the ratio is their signal here, not our judgement of them.

# Researcher Reputation Recognised / submitted
1 jackds 200 5 / 7 71%
2 gammarex 171 3 / 4 75%
3 bogdantc 169 7 / 9 78%
4 sheikhrishad0 130 4 / 6 67%
5 yaworsk 121 3 / 4 75%
6 basant0x01 118 4 / 15 27%
7 insomniac 117 6 / 8 75%
8 niemand_sec 116 3 / 4 75%
9 lmx 114 2 / 2 100%
9 michiel 114 2 / 2 100%
10 brdoors2 110 5 / 7 71%
11 bugs3ra 105 5 / 7 71%
12 0xprial 103 5 / 6 83%
13 alpha66 102 6 / 21 29%
14 0x110 95 5 / 9 56%
15 breakthing5 89 2 / 3 67%
16 4lemon 81 3 / 3 100%
17 dorkybug 79 2 / 2 100%
17 mur90210 64 2 / 2 100%
18 ranjit_p 78 4 / 6 67%
19 nutrino7 76 2 / 6 33%
19 prosadizaman 76 3 / 5 60%
21 cauldr0n 71 1 / 2 50%
22 kurama 70 5 / 6 83%
22 mikelitos 70 1 / 3 33%

Showing the top 25 of 303 credited on HackerOne.

Program profile HackerOne · imported

Facts published by HackerOne on the program's own page, not reported by researchers, and not part of the BugRater grade. Last checked 16 Sep 2026.

Cloud accounting

Responsiveness
88% HackerOne’s figure
Swag
No
Currency
USD
Submissions
Open
Launched
Apr 2016
Scope entries
4 HackerOne’s count

Scope

4 assets
AssetTypeEligibilityMax severity
com.moneybird.android GOOGLE PLAY APP ID ✓ bounty Critical
com.moneybird.Moneybird APPLE STORE APP ID ✓ bounty Critical
moneybird.com URL ✓ bounty Critical
moneybirdstorage.com URL ✓ bounty Critical