BugRater
Early access: the directory is still filling out, and every rating here is a reported experience.
← The brief
Published finding · Bugcrowd

$2,500 awarded on Tamedia.

critical paid unresolved
01 · The record

Everything Bugcrowd published about this

Programme
Tamedia In our directory, so it has reviews and a grade.
Platform handle
tamedia
Asset
Not published The platform did not name an asset for this entry.
Severity
critical Bugcrowd rates P1–P5; this is that rating in HackerOne's words so the two feeds can sit in one table.
Award
$2,500 What the platform printed. Where a report carried more than one payment they are summed.
Found by
otaku Named because the finder allowed the platform to name them.
State
unresolved — accepted, not yet fixed
Accepted
21 May 2026 4 months ago. This is the date the programme accepted the finding.
First seen here
16 August 2026 When our sweep first read this entry. It says nothing about the finding, only about us.
Platform reference
1805231e-8c21-4162-8410-c81ac4b08540
View the programme on Bugcrowd ↗ Bugcrowd publishes the acceptance, not the submission. There is no public write-up for this finding anywhere, and no page for the entry itself, so this link goes to the programme. Everything Bugcrowd did publish about it is already above.
02 · Is this figure normal

Where this award sits

A single large number tells you nothing on its own. What matters is whether this programme pays like this routinely or whether this was the one time it did.

#1 of 3 here
$1,250 this programme's median
$2,500 its largest published
#197 of 1,427 awards we hold

This is the largest award we have ever seen this programme publish, out of 3 awards. At 2.0× the median, it is well above what this programme normally prints.

Every figure here is drawn only from awards a platform chose to publish, which is a minority of what gets paid. Read the median as "of the payouts made public", never as "what this programme pays".

03 · The finder

The only finding we hold from otaku

This is the only published finding we hold from otaku on Bugcrowd. That is a statement about our coverage, not about their record: we read a few pages of each feed per sweep, and most accepted work is never published at all.

Counted within Bugcrowd only. The same handle on another platform may or may not be the same person, and this page will not assume it is.

04 · The programme

What else Tamedia has published

See Tamedia's grade and researcher reviews →

Where this came from. One row of a public platform feed, stored as published and never edited. We hold no report title, no write-up and no reproduction steps, because the feeds do not carry them and we do not go looking for them. A withheld name stays withheld; if a finder later asks the platform to un-name them, the next sweep un-names them here. Absence of an award figure is publication policy, not evidence a programme did not pay.