Published finding · Bugcrowd

Tamedia A finding accepted against https://www.tagesanzeiger.ch. Bugcrowd published no award figure for it.

high resolved

01 · The record

Everything Bugcrowd published about this

Programme: Tamedia In our directory, so it has reviews and a grade.
Platform handle: tamedia
Asset: https://www.tagesanzeiger.ch The specific asset the finding landed against, as the platform named it.
Severity: high Bugcrowd rates P1–P5; this is that rating in HackerOne's words so the two feeds can sit in one table.
Award: Not published This does not mean nothing was paid. Both platforms let a programme accept a finding without publishing the figure, and most do.
Found by: Withheld The platform did not publish a name. We store that as withheld and never guess.
State: resolved — the programme has fixed it
Accepted: 10 March 2026 7 months ago. This is the date the programme accepted the finding.
First seen here: 16 August 2026 When our sweep first read this entry. It says nothing about the finding, only about us.
Platform reference: 71a79612-151f-4931-8b8c-70a9faf75492

View the programme on Bugcrowd ↗ Bugcrowd publishes the acceptance, not the submission. There is no public write-up for this finding anywhere, and no page for the entry itself, so this link goes to the programme. Everything Bugcrowd did publish about it is already above.

03 · The programme

What else Tamedia has published

https://www.tagesanzeiger.ch high · unresolved · yyx_roy · 1 month ago $1,250
https://www.tagesanzeiger.ch critical · unresolved · withheld · 2 months ago —
https://www.tagesanzeiger.ch low · unresolved · mouhamedzz · 2 months ago —
https://www.tagesanzeiger.ch low · resolved · marius_dp · 3 months ago $200
https://www.tagesanzeiger.ch critical · unresolved · withheld · 3 months ago —
Finding accepted critical · unresolved · otaku · 4 months ago $2,500
API calls going to disco-api from https://www.tagesanzeiger.ch critical · unresolved · withheld · 5 months ago —
https://www.tagesanzeiger.ch critical · unresolved · withheld · 5 months ago —

See Tamedia's grade and researcher reviews →

Where this came from. One row of a public platform feed, stored as published and never edited. We hold no report title, no write-up and no reproduction steps, because the feeds do not carry them and we do not go looking for them. A withheld name stays withheld; if a finder later asks the platform to un-name them, the next sweep un-names them here. Absence of an award figure is publication policy, not evidence a programme did not pay.