Early access. The directory is still filling out, and every rating here comes from a researcher's reported experience.
RA

Rathore

@Vansh_Rathore, member since August 2026
✎Contributor ◷Early member
BugScore
not set
Unrated

Not enough independently verifiable evidence yet, so there is no score to show.

Contribution
21/100

Reviews written on BugRater and how useful others found them.

How this BugScore is built
Platform standing 0/40
No verified HackerOne profile is linked, so there is no platform signal to read. This is the most defensible input we have. Link and verify HackerOne to earn it.
HackerOne signal percentile 0/20
HackerOne has not published a signal percentile for your account, so this earns nothing yet.
HackerOne impact percentile 0/12
HackerOne has not published an impact percentile for your account, so this earns nothing yet.
HackerOne reputation 0/8
HackerOne shows no reputation figure for your account yet.
Vendor-confirmed credit 0/30
No vendor has publicly confirmed your work yet. A verified CVE credit, acknowledgement, or HackerOne thanks counts here, and you can add a CVE from any vendor yourself.
Moderator-verified evidence 0/20
You have no moderator-verified private evidence. Private, NDA’d, or direct-to-vendor work can be verified here without going public.
Verification breadth 0/10
You haven’t verified a platform account yet.
Penalties 0-10
No HackerOne warnings and no upheld disputes count against you.

BugScore gives the most weight to evidence that is hard to fake, such as HackerOne's own percentiles, vendor-confirmed credits and evidence a moderator checked. Writing reviews here does not change it. Reviews count toward Contribution, below. You're Unrated because nothing hard to fake is linked yet, so there is nothing to grade. Private and pseudonymous work counts. To get a score, link a platform, claim a credit or submit evidence.

How this Contribution is built
Reviews written 8/40
You’ve written 2 program reviews.
Helpful votes received 4/25
Other members marked your reviews helpful 4 times.
Programs covered 6/15
You’ve reviewed 2 distinct programs.
Balanced reviewing 0/10
Post both positive and critical reviews to show you call it as you see it.
Tenure 3/10
You’ve been a member for 3 months.

Contribution measures activity on BugRater: reviews, helpful votes, breadth and tenure. It is meant to be easy to earn. We keep it separate from BugScore so activity here cannot stand in for demonstrated skill.

No verified platform accounts yet.
2
Reviews written
2
Programs reviewed
2
Reports represented
0 resolved · 0%
4
Helpful votes
How they review
4.5 avg rating given
Where they hunt
  1. 1
  2. Bugcrowd1
When they review · last 12 months
Table view
Reviews published by Rathore per month
MonthReviews
December 20250
January 20260
February 20260
March 20260
April 20260
May 20260
June 20260
July 20260
August 20262
September 20260
October 20260
November 20260

Programs reviewed

2

Reviews

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) - Vulnerability Disclosure Program
Securing the Cosmos: Earning Hall of Fame with NASA
★★★★★ positive

Reporting to the NASA Vulnerability Disclosure Program on Bugcrowd is an incredibly rewarding experience. The security team is highly professional, and they genuinely value the efforts of the community in keeping their massive infrastructure secure. Receiving Hall of Fame recognition and a Letter of Appreciation from NASA is a fantastic milestone for any security researcher. When tackling a scope as vast as NASA's, you don't need to rely on noisy automated scanners. My biggest piece of advice for this program is to master Google Dorking. Advanced dorking is arguably the most powerful technique you can use here. It allows you to sift through the noise, map out forgotten assets, and identify edge cases or misconfigurations that standard tooling completely misses. If you take the time to refine your search parameters and manually investigate the architecture, you can uncover high-impact issues. I would highly recommend this program to anyone looking to make a meaningful impact and test their manual recon skills!

via Bugcrowd reports 1 1st reply Within 3 days resubmit yes recommends yes skill Intermediate
Rathore Aug 11, 2026 Share ↗ 2 helpful
Apple Security Bounty
Authentication Bypass on *.apple.com
★★★★★ positive

Hunting on Apple requires patience, but verifying a successful fix makes the wait worthwhile. I reported a vulnerability on *.apple.com where a advance client-side response manipulation allowed a complete bypass of the authentication gate. Tracking the status took some proactive follow-up. While their initial response times can feel sluggish compared to standard bug bounty platforms, the Apple Security Team was professional once communication opened up regarding the remediation and potential bounty rewards. The highlight was working through the remediation phase and actively verifying the fix once they patched the flaw. For other researchers targeting Apple: rely heavily on manual testing and business logic over automated scanners, document your reproduction steps flawlessly, and don't be afraid to politely ping them for updates while you wait.

reports 1 1st reply 1–3 months resubmit yes recommends yes skill Intermediate
Rathore Aug 8, 2026 Share ↗ 2 helpful